Increasingly Likely That Alleged Job Strength is a Mirage of Part Time Second Jobs

Employment and Jobs Data from BLS, chart by Mish

Earlier today I noted The Jobs Report Much Is Weaker Than It Looks For Six Months

I have been commenting on the jobs (Establishment Nonfarm Payrolls) vs employment (Household Survey) discrepancy for four months. The two surveys measure different things. A person is either employed or not, but someone can have multiple jobs.

Generally the numbers move in the same direction over time. The Household Survey is noisy, but 6 months is a reasonable time frame for discrepancies to resolve.

If you assume both surveys are correct, then the interpretation is that the strength in jobs since March is due to 1.6 to 2.0 million people taking extra part-time jobs.

The only other explanation is that one of the surveys is flat out wrong. 

This report is a further attempt to explain the discrepancy. 

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number, generally released the first Friday of every month. It is based on employer reporting.

The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures unemployment and many other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Employment Level vs Sum of Full and Part Time Employment

  • Because of the way the BLS makes seasonal adjustment, the sum of full time and part time jobs does not match the total employment level. 
  • However, those discrepancies are random and swing equally in both directions monthly by +-250,000. That is not the source of a consistent one-way discrepancy between the trends. 

Full Time and Part Time Employment 

Employment and Jobs Data from BLS, chart by Mish

March 2022 Employment vs Jobs

  • Full Time: 132,718,000
  • Part Time: 25,902,000
  • Sum of Full and Part Time: 158,620
  • Nonfarm Payrolls: 150,856,000

August 2022 Employment vs Jobs

  • Full Time: 132,335,000
  • Part Time: 26,237,000
  • Sum of Full and Part Time: 158,572,000
  • Nonfarm Payrolls: 152,744,000

March to August Change 

  • Full Time: -383,000
  • Part Time: +335,000
  • Sum of Full and Part Time: -48,000
  • Nonfarm Payrolls: +1,888,000

March to August Key Points

The economy added 1,888,000 jobs while full time employment declined by 383,000 and total employment (as measured by sum of full and part time) was down by 48,000. 

The total discrepancy between the trends is 1,888,000 + 48,000 = 1,936,000

Nonfarm Payrolls and Employment Level

What’s Happening?

You get slightly different number if you compare the employment level to nonfarm payrolls (instead of the sum of full and part time employment) as I did above. 

The latter method shows a surplus of 1.614 million jobs vs employment gains whereas the sum of parts method has a 1.936 million discrepancy.  

A likely explanation for the divergences is boomer retirements coupled with approximately 2 million people taking extra part time jobs to make ends meet due to high inflation.

No matter what the explanation, if the Household and BLS Jobs reports are both reasonably accurate, the highly touted jobs boom is dramatically overstated in any practical sense, especially real consumer spending.

Don’t anticipate strong spending based on strong jobs because the data suggests this is a mirage of part-time job strength (as little as one extra 8-hour shift, or less). 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Portlander2
Portlander2
1 year ago
Mish makes a good point but, also, it should be stated that this disagreement has been a consistent feature of these time series since the late ’40’s. It’s been occasionally much wider than it is today. Eyeballing the St. Louis “Fred” chart, it seems the disagreement is narrower now than it has been in most of the last fifty years. It isn’t particularly unusual for nonfarm payrolls to rise while employment level remains flat or even declines (and vice versa). What Mish observes today happened (most recently) between ~ June 2010 and August 2011. We were just coming out of the GFC recession. But the reverse happened ~ between Feb. 2002 and August 2003, coming out of the 2001 recession. In the last three months both series have been rising together, indicating employment strength. Of course, employment is a lagging indicator, so we could be in recession now. But I wonder if Mish is reading too much into these tea leaves?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
1.7 million Americans who’ve retired in the past year are returning to work — here are the top 3 surprising reasons why
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Look at #3. I think it’s a bigger factor than commonly realized. It’s going to get much bigger if remote work takes hold. No one ever wants to think about the ramifications until it’s too late.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
all the 20 somethings i know(around tons of them in college and kids friends) are loving life with all the job opportunities. many working 60 to 70 hours at different jobs. when i was a kid in early 80s, unemployment was 10% nationwide and 20% in nyc. i would have LOVED to be able to easily find work for 70 hours when i had the energy and hunger for dough……………….i don’t know anyone out of work. never been like this. work life does change. we have a new at home and uber eats economy. engineers working from home as do lawyers and artists…………..
Northeaster
Northeaster
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
This is exactly what my kids did. Kid #1 has zero student loan debt because of it. Kid #2 worked two different part-time jobs, one included a dishwasher for $17/hour!
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Watch for the layoffs from summer hires starting in Sept!!!
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  JRM
Captured in seasonal adjustment.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Double the U-6 number and your closer to the real unemployment numbers!!!
U-6=7.00%
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
I have not been shy with my praise for Mish’s non-consensus early recession call, but nor have I been shy about the problems with using employment data that have clearly been distorted by the pandemic QE and now the inflation that it and the free money have caused.
I have said that U-3 has been 4.5%-5%; that labor force participation is throwing headfakes. The “strength” in the job markets has been illusory, and the full-time v part-time numbers are showing it. If the numbers work to turn the Fed’s noodle into a spine, I suppose that’s a good thing. But it’s not any reason to be taking the employment data at face value.
I have also not been shy about pushing back hard against claims that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is monkeying with the numbers. I see absolutely no evidence for it. Rather, the BLS is confronted with exogenous shocks that have rendered its faithfully gathered numbers much less reliable as economic indicators much less policy guidance. Relying on employment numbers is like the French reliance on the Maginot Line. There was nothing wrong with Maginot itself; rather, events made it irrelevant.
Employment data isn’t the only data that have been put into a new light lately. Even bigger — much bigger — is the divergence between oil markets and physical reality. The employment numbers are valid in the sense that they accurately measure what they examine; the issue there is how to interpret that data. Oil markets have always been murky, but the current situation is hugely complicated by Biden’s use of the strategic petroleum reserve, and Russia’s evations of the stupid sanctions, and Biden’s ham-fisted attempts to beg the Venezuelans and pressure the Saudis.
The oil markets won’t stay disconnected from the physical commodity for long. People might argue, with considerable justification, that the gold markets have long been maniuplated. That can be sustained over time, because physical gold isn’t burned among other things. Not so with oil. The disconnection won’t last for long.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Agree. I actually think we may be headed for a softer landing than people think. Boomers are coming back to the workforce and jobs are still plentiful for the right people. Covid changed the economy and now it is still changing. To use the football analogy the economy is getting back to being able to block and tackle and not the trick plays that were distorting everything.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
We shall see. On this one, I am a skeptic. I really think that employment data is a poor indicator for the reasons I mentioned above. If it gives the Fed cover to do what they should have done anyway, okay. But I’m still an old-school facts and logic type, and on that basis I think employment data are unreliable — at this time. Not in and of themselves, but as useful signposts — again, at this time. That will change, but I’d be shocked to my socks if the bean counters in the BLS aren’t tearing their hair out right now.
Ericdude
Ericdude
1 year ago
Peter Schiff has been talking about this for a while.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Ericdude
Yes he has.
Continuously, incessantly for more than 20 years in my experience.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
The employment level is so close to breaking the pre-COVID high that next month’s report will be a participation trophy. FYI, September is a little late to be filling teaching positions.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
I agree, but until it turns negative, we’re not in a recession.
Next Shoe To Drop
Next Shoe To Drop
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Goobermint will just keep changing the definition of ‘recession’ so we’ll have prosperity forever!
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
The chocolate ration has been raised to 30 grams! Double plus good!
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
“Don’t anticipate strong spending based on strong jobs because the data suggests this is a mirage of part-time job strength (as little as one extra 8-hour shift, or less).”
Low income people have a 40% increase in credit card debt. On average credit card debt is up 13% from a year ago, that’s where all the spend is coming from and it won’t end well as interest rates continue to rise. I think the APR on most cards is 40% now!
It’s time to take a look at which banks have the most credit cards out and profit…oh wait, they’ll just get bailed out again and stick it to the taxpayer, never mind.
Next Shoe To Drop
Next Shoe To Drop
1 year ago
Don’t anticipate strong spending based on strong jobs because the data suggests this is a mirage of part-time job strength…
Based on the latest Q2 credit card debt levels spiking, I’d say Duhmerikan consumers are just about tapped out and are relying on last-resort payment methods to afford food and rent. Once consumption craters, we’re going to see mass layoffs in the services, real estate, automobile, etc, sectors. Full blown Fed-induced low-rate virtuous-cycle lunacy about to end abruptly and crash straight down into vicious-cycle correction.
dtj
dtj
1 year ago
Man checks out own groceries and bags them = “part time grocery clerk”. Child who does chores and receives allowance = “part time domestic worker”. Grandma wins at local church bingo = “part time professional gambler”.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  dtj
Do you always make it up, or is that recent for you?

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.